| |
Criteria for assessing the Wiki
Page history last edited by Miss Brady 2 yrs ago
Criteria for assessing the Wiki
| Criteria for assessing by teachers |
Criteria for assessing by other students |
Criteria for self assessment |
|
Sophisticated understanding of the topic
Relevant visual aids
Aesthetics
Linking and referencing
Group work
Appropriate language
ICT skills (use and understanding of a Wiki)
|
Catchy/attention grabbing
Easy to understand
Good structure
Value of information
Links
Visually/orally/aurally pleasing
Gets to the point
|
Enjoyable working experience
How proud am I of my work?
Reaching my own expectations
Depth of understanding
Own effort
Team work
Have I helped someone?
Satisfaction gained
Can I apply the information?
What have I understood?
|
Criteria for assessing the Wiki
|
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
Comments (1)
Kelvin Jones said
at 9:21 am on Jun 19, 2007
This criteria is highly effectitious as it accurately portrays the assessment criteria required for a successful wiki. If it were anything else I would find it fundementally irreconcilable that this shouldn't be used. It would be obsolete to use anything else. No use of referencing so I'll have to take marks off for that. 35/400.3265981425645
You don't have permission to comment on this page.